[自然科学と心理科学の間の心理医学-Tertium non Datur？]

精神と相馬は、生物医学のための科学的因果分析と社会的帝国研究のために開かれています。どちらも、主観的な意味と意図的な行為の表意的な言説にアクセス可能です。ドイツ語は、この違いを「ケルパー」（ボディ）と「ライブ」（具体化された魂 - 精神的な身体）の用語とマークします。Bieri-Trilemmaは、結果として生じる認識論的災難を示しています。いわゆる行動医学は、存在論的メソドロジーの唯物論の変動でも、病気の主題の純粋な現象学でも、そのような矛盾から抜け出すこともありません。システム理論的調停の試みは、通常、伝統的な議論のレビューが不十分であることを証明するだけです。このペーパーでは、心理医学の分野におけるいわゆる体の魂の問題に向けた現在の興味深い立場のいくつかを概説します。意図的な伝記アプローチ、生物医学的アプローチ（同時性相関（Schultz-hencke）、および脳と相関主義（Kurthen and Linke）について説明します。、つまり、意味のあるプロセスと生物心理社会的犠牲者の解釈学的分析の相補性時折、主観的な時空間軸で彼らのカウンターパートを見つけます。彼らの中心的な神経基質に対応して、実際の互換性の神秘性、つまり必然的に二重の談話。

Psyche and soma are open to scientific-causal analysis for biomedicine as well as for social-empirical studies. Both are furthermore accessible to the ideographic discourse of subjective meanings and intentional acts. The German language marks this difference with the terms of "Körper" (body) and "Leib" (embodied soul--spirited body). The Bieri-trilemma demonstrates the resulting epistemological calamity. Neither the so-called behavioral medicine as variation of an ontologic-methodological materialism nor pure phenomenology of the sick subject lead the way out of such inconsistencies. Attempts of systemtheoretical mediation usually only prove their poor reviewing of traditional discussion. This paper outlines some of the currently interesting positions towards the so-called body-soul-problem in the field of psychosomatic medicine, at the same time warning against hasty expectations. We discuss the intentional-biographic approach, the biomedical approach (including the simultaneity correlation (Schultz-Hencke) as well as the brain-soul-correlationism (Kurthen and Linke). As our result we maintain the complementarity of a double discourse for psychosomatic medicine, namely the complementarity of hermeneutic analysis of meaningful processes and of bio-psycho-social casualties. The complementary discourse levels occasionally find their counterparts on an intersubjective-objective time-space-axis. For this we suggest the concept of socialempiric and biomedical markers. Attempts of mediation, be it from systemic-emergence-theoretical or from hermeneutic perspective of interaction forms and their interaction engrams corresponding to their central nervous substratum, turn out to be mystifications of actual incompatibilities, namely of the inevitably double discourse. For this the theory of absolute processes (W. Sellars) promises mediation, but so far no more.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)