ムーレア、フランスのポリネシアにおけるaedes aegypti（l）およびaedes polynesiensisマーク（双pt目：culicidae）：成人集団構造と病原体（wucherereria bancrofti and Dirofilaria immitis）の研究感染率は、地域および季節性疫学リスクを示すデンギウムおよびフィルリアスの季節性リスクを示す

ムーレア島、フランスのポリネシア、デング熱およびフィラリア症の地元のベクターであるムーレア島のエーデスaegypti（L.）とエーデスポリネシス（マーク）の個体群は、東、北、西海岸の9つの地域での着陸/噛むコレクションによってサンプリングされました。、乾季、2003年と2004年の早期および後期雨季（9月）の間に、集団の疫学的に重要な特徴を調査し、地域と数ヶ月間でそれらを比較しました。両方の種の噛み速度は、乾季後期から雨季後期まで、毎月各地域の各種の増加（必ずしも有意ではない）傾向があり、北海岸地域はAEの噛み速度が大幅に高くなりました。aegypti。AEの授精率。Polynesiensisの雌（94.5-98.8％）は、AEの雌よりも一貫して大きかった。研究全体を通じてaegypti（87.5-93.5％）が、月と地域の間のいずれの種の授精率に有意差はありませんでした。パリティ率は一般に北海岸のサンプルで最も高く、両方の種で西海岸のサンプルで最も低く、各種の月ごとに一般的に増加しました（常に有意ではありませんが）AEの範囲は52.9-88.8％でした。PolynesiensisおよびAEの28.6-53.6％。aegypti、AEの高い重力速度（15.8-45.9％）。Aegyptiサンプル（栄養栄養サイクルで複数回その摂食を反映する）は、種内比較と特異的比較の両方を混乱させました。糸状感染症はAEではまれでした。aegypti、ただし、W。bancroftiとD. immitisの両方が記録され、感染率はAEで記録されました。Polynesiensisは、両方のフィラリアの各地域での研究期間を通じて増加し、W。Bancroftiに最大4.6％感染し、1.4％が感染し、D。immitisで最大6.3％感染し、2.5％感染しました。W. bancroftiの場合、感染率は西海岸および乾季にも著しく低かったのに対し、感染段階の割合は雨季後期に有意に高かった。D. Immitisの場合、地域間の感染率に有意な差はありませんでしたが、雨季後期には速度が著しく大きかった。すべての月の降雨は、両方のベクトルの個体数を維持し、季節の間に比較的少数の有意差を説明しています。ただし、雨季はベクターの存在量と寿命の増加を提供し、伝播のリスクが高まる可能性があります。地域間に示されている違いは統計的な意味でも限られていましたが、地元の人々と観光客の両方が集中し、海港と空港がある場所では、北部と東部地域にリスクが増加しています。監視とベクトル制御。

Populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes polynesiensis (Marks) on Moorea Island, French Polynesia, the local vectors of dengue and filariasis, respectively, were sampled by landing/biting collection at nine localities on the east, north, and west coasts, during the late dry season, early and late wet season (September-May) 2003 and 2004, to investigate epidemiologically important features of the populations and compare them between regions and months. Biting rates of both species tended to increase (but not always significantly) for each species in each region each month from the late dry season to the late wet season, and the north coast region had significantly higher biting rates of Ae. aegypti. Insemination rates of Ae. polynesiensis females (94.5-98.8%) were consistently greater than those of Ae. aegypti (87.5-93.5%) throughout the study, but there was no significant difference in the insemination rates of either species between months and regions. Parity rates were generally highest in north coast samples and lowest in west coast samples for both species and generally increased (albeit not always significantly) by month for each species, with a range of 52.9-88.8% for Ae. polynesiensis and 28.6-53.6% for Ae. aegypti, although the high gravid rate (15.8-45.9%) of Ae. aegypti samples (reflecting its feeding more than once in a gonotrophic cycle) confounded both intraspecific and interspecific comparisons. Filarial infection was rare in Ae. aegypti, although both W. bancrofti and D. immitis were recorded, and infection rates in Ae. polynesiensis increased through the study period in each region for both filarias, with up to 4.6% infected and 1.4% infective for W. bancrofti and up to 6.3% infected and 2.5% infective for D. immitis. For W. bancrofti, infection rates were significantly lower on the west coast and also in the dry season, whereas rates for infective stages were significantly greater in the late wet season. For D. immitis there was no significant difference in infection rates between regions, but rates were significantly greater in the late wet season. Rainfall in all months sustains populations of both vectors and explains the relatively few significant differences between seasons; however, the wet season may provide for increased vector abundance and longevity, and present a potentially increased risk for transmission. Although the differences shown between regions also were limited in a statistical sense, there were increased risks for the northern and eastern regions, where both locals and tourists are concentrated and where the seaports and airport are located, and these areas should be priority targets for disease surveillance and vector control.