[DSM-5のPTSDチェックリスト（PCL-5）：結果のアンケート（OQ-45）および実用的なユーティリティとの応答性の比較]

DSM-5（PCL-5）のPTSDチェックリストは、PTSDの患者に定期的な結果監視（ROM）に適した追加である可能性があります。<br/> <br/> <br/> aim：PCL-5は、管理が患者から必要とする余分な努力に値するかどうかを判断します。Arkin。<br/>結果：機器のスコア間の相関関係は高く、繰り返し測定の分散分析では応答性の違いは明らかになりませんでした。CohenのD（0.49対0.43）とDelta T（5.0対4.4）の比較は、PCL-5のわずかに優れた応答性を示し、また回収された患者の割合はOQ-SDに比べてPCL-5に大きくなりました。しかし、PCL-5は、個々の患者の症候学の性質と重症度に関するより詳細な情報を提供し、PCL-5では、OQ-SDよりも臨床的に有意な変化を示すことができました。PTSD患者のROMにPCL-5を追加することをお勧めします。

The PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) may be a suitable addition for routine outcome monitoring (ROM) for patients with PTSD.<br/> AIM: To determine whether the PCL-5 is worth the extra effort that administration requires from the patient.<br/> METHOD: Pretest and retest measurement results of the PCL-5 and the OQ-45 were compared head-to-head in 464 patients from the Sinai Center of Arkin.<br/> RESULTS: The correlations between scores on the instruments were high and analysis of variance for repeated measurements revealed no difference in responsiveness. Comparison of Cohen's d (0.49 vs. 0.43) and Delta T (5.0 vs. 4.4), indicated a slightly better responsiveness of the PCL-5 and also the proportion of recovered patients was greater according to the PCL-5 compared to the OQ-SD.<br/> CONCLUSION: At first glance, the PCL-5 and the OQ-SD were equally sensitive to detect change during treatment. However, the PCL-5 provided more detailed information about the nature and severity of symptomatology in an individual patient and with the PCL-5 we were slightly better able to demonstrate clinical significant change than with the OQ-SD. We recommend to add the PCL-5 to ROM for patients with PTSD.